VAT R1

Facts
A VAT registered company is engaged in the construction industry.

With respect to building and civil engineering contract works entered into with its clients, provision is made in the contracts for an advance payment to be effected by the client. This payment is usually secured by a bank guarantee given to the client.

The advance payment is subsequently recouped, in installments, by direct deduction from the progress payments made to the company according to the degree of the work completed as certified by the Quantity Surveyor.

Point at issue
Whether advance payment in the construction industry amounts to a supply and is subject to VAT where the supply is taxable.

Ruling
A supply is deemed to take place at the time an advance payment is made. Where the supply made by a VAT-Registered person is taxable, the advance payment in respect of that supply is subject to VAT.

A VAT invoice or invoice, depending upon the status of the recipient of the supply may therefore be issued in connection with a claim for advance payment.

Go Top

VAT R2

Facts

A company incorporated in Mauritius holds an offshore license issued by the then MOBAA. Its principal activity is to provide software and information technology services offshore. It proposes to import intellectual property in the form of software, which will thereafter be licensed to users worldwide.

The company proposes to register for VAT in accordance with section 15(1) of the Value Added Tax Act 1998 in order to claim repayment of the VAT payable at Customs and to apply for deregistration once its repayment claim has been entertained.

Points at issue

(1) Whether the company will be allowed to deregister

(2) Whether on deregistration, VAT will be payable on the goods forming part of the assets of the company.

Ruling

As a company making exclusively zero-rated supplies, it is not bound to register by virtue of section 15(2) of the Act.

However, if it does not avail itself of the provisions of Section 15(2), the company whose turnover exceeds the prescribed limits will have to be registered under section 15(1) of the Act.

As a VAT-Registered company, it will have to comply with all the provisions of the Act, including the submission of returns. On deregistration the company will have to pay tax on the goods forming part of the assets of the company under section 18(2) of the Act.

Go Top

VAT R3

Facts

(1) A company is incorporated in December 2002 to take over retrospectively as from January 2002 the entire business of five companies as a going concern.

It has applied for VAT Registration as from 1 January 2003.

(2) All the business assets less liabilities excluding borrowings of the five companies are to be transferred to the newly incorporated company and the five companies are to apply for cancellation of registration. However, for the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002 a claim is to be made by the newly incorporated company to each of the five companies for all the revenues received by them on its behalf. Similarly, a claim is to be made by each of the five companies to the newly incorporated company for the expenses incurred by them for the same period.

(3) The five companies are engaged mainly in making zero-rated supplies and make claims for repayment regularly.

Points at issue

(1) Whether the transaction described above falls under section 63(3) of Value Added Tax Act.

(2) Whether VAT is chargeable on the claims for refunds of revenues/expenses.

(3) Whether VAT credits due to the five companies as at the date of their deregistration will be refunded by the VAT Office.

Ruling

(1) The transfer as a going concern of the whole business of each of the five companies to the newly incorporated company falls under section 63(3) of the Value Added Tax Act.

(2) The transfer of the five companies as a going concern to the newly incorporated company takes place on 1 January 2003, the date on which the latter has been registered for VAT. No VAT is chargeable on the claims for the refund of revenue accrued and expenses incurred during the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002 as they form part of the arrangement for the transfer.

(3) Any amount standing to the credit of each of the five companies as at the date of cancellation of registration is to be repaid after a thorough audit has been carried out on submission of the claims for repayment.

Go Top

VAT R4

Facts

Following amendments brought to the Value Added Tax Act by the Finance Act 2003, services provided by an insurance broker are subject to VAT with effect from 1 October 2003 and insurance brokers are compulsorily required to be registered for VAT irrespective of the turnover of their taxable supplies.

Point at issue

Whether insurance brokers should charge VAT to policyholders or to insurers.

Ruling

To the extent that an insurance broker arranges insurance business with insurers, the broker therefore makes a taxable supply to the insurers.

VAT should accordingly be charged by the broker to the insurer on the amount of the commission/fees receivable from the insurers.

Go Top

VAT R5

Facts

A proposed leasing company is to be incorporated as a category 1 Global Business Licence Company (GBL 1) to carry out offshore leasing activities. The activities fall under the definition of financial services or financial business activities as specified in Part II of the First Schedule to the Financial Services Development Act 2001.

Point at issue

Whether VAT is chargeable on the international leasing activities carried out by a GBL 1 company and which are provided outside Mauritius.

Ruling

Item 50 of the First Schedule to the Value Added Tax Act provides for the exemption of certain financial services including such other financial services as may be prescribed.

The prescribed financial services are as laid down in the Sixth Schedule to the regulations of the Value Added Tax Act(GN 87 of 1998).

With regards to leasing, items 30(a) and 38 of the First Schedule to the Value Added Tax Act provides for the exemption of charges under a finance lease agreement and aircraft leasing respectively.

However, item 6(a) of Fifth schedule to the Value Added Tax Act provides for the zero-rating of-

"The supply of services to a person who belongs in a country other than Mauritius and who is outside Mauritius at the time the services are performed."

In the circumstances, no VAT is to be charged on international leasing activities of the GBL 1 company supplied to persons not resident in Mauritius and who are outside Mauritius at the time the services are performed.

Go Top

VAT R6

Ruling given under section 69 A of the Value Added Tax Act.

Facts

A VAT registered tour operator proposes to sell tours and packages with Reunion Island as destination. The Reunion tours are to be organised by tour operators based in Reunion and the tours and packages are expected to be purchased by -

(a) local residents of Mauritius and or

(b) overseas tour operators in overseas market for overseas clients.

The packages to be obtained from the Reunion tour operators will be of two types­-

(1) Upon the sale of the package, the VAT registered person will remit the whole amount to the Reunion tour operator and will receive a fixed percentage commission of the amount remitted.

(2) The package will be purchased and subsequently sold with a margin

Point as Issue

Whether the supplies by the VAT Registered tour operator in the above cases fall outside the scope of VAT, such that no VAT is to be charged on the income derived by the VAT Registered tour operator.

Ruling

The supply to be made by the VAT registered tour operator is that of arranging for tours in Reunion.

Where the supply is made to residents in Mauritius, the consideration received by the V A T registered tour operator, whether in terms of commission or profit, (that is the amount received less amount remitted to Reunion tour operator) is subject to VAT at the rate of 15 per cent.

Where the supplies by the VAT registered tour operator are made to overseas clients through overseas tour operators, the consideration received is subject to VAT at zero-rate in accordance with item 6 (a) of the Fifth Schedule to the Value Added Tax Act.

Go Top

VAT R7

Ruling given under section 69 A of the Value Added Tax Act.

Facts

A VAT registered entity, wholly owned by an overseas entity provides marketing and technical support to the local network of distributors of the parent company's products. It recharges all its local expenses plus a margin to the overseas entity.

It now proposes to import computer equipment which will be used by a hotel group. It will capitalise and depreciate the equipment in its books and recharges the annual depreciation plus a margin to the parent company, as is the case with the other expenses.

On the other hand, the hotel group will pay a monthly fee to the overseas parent company of the locally VAT registered company for rental, maintenance and technical support.

Point at issue

Whether the VAT paid on importation of the computer equipment will qualify for repayment on the basis that the depreciation charge plus the margin is a zero-rated supply to the overseas parent company.

Ruling

The billing to the overseas entity of depreciation charge plus a margin is not a taxable supply for VAT purposes. The effective supply is the rental of the equipment which can only be done by the importer of the equipment itself, i.e the VAT registered entity.

Hence the question of repayment on the basis of zero-rated supplies does not arise.

Go Top

VAT R8

Ruling given under section 69A of the Value Added Tax Act.

Facts

Company (A) is engaged in the rental of immoveable properties, other than for residential purposes. It registered for VAT on 5 October 2005 whereas it ought to have been registered as from 1 July 2002.

Goods and services used prior to registration to make the taxable supplies are supported by –

(a) Invoices, showing VAT separately, raised in the name of a related company (B) and in that of another company (C).

(b) Receipts and other evidence in name of company A and in that of company B.

In both cases, the auditor of company A has confirmed that the transactions have been paid incurred and accounted for by company A.

Company B is not entitled to and has not taken credit for input tax in respect of the transactions.

Point at Issue

Whether company A is entitled to take credit for input tax in respect of taxable supplies supported by evidence as per (a) and (b) above.

Ruling

Subject to the limitations specified in section 21 of the Value Added Tax Act, credit for input tax would be allowed to company A in respect of taxable supplies invoiced to company A or torelated company B, and certified by the auditor of company A as having been incurred, paid and accounted for by company A, provided that –

(a) the taxable supplies are supported by –

(i) invoices showing VAT separately; or

(ii) statements from the VAT registered suppliers showing –

- invoice No. and date;
- name of company in which invoice issued;
- value of taxable supply;
- amount of VAT claimed; and
- VAT return in which accounted for.

(b) The auditor of related company B certifies that the invoices issued in its name have not been accounted for by company B.

Go Top

VAT R9

Facts

A construction company was awarded a contract for the construction of waterfront private residences by a developer and promoter. Upon request by the promoter, an invoice equal to the value of the works to be carried out by the company was issued on 29 September 2006. However, payments relative to the invoice shall be effected according to the progress of work as and when this would be certified by the principal agent.

Point in issue

As the VAT Act has been amended with effect from 1 October 2006 whereby the supply of construction works in respect of private residences is a taxable supply as from above date, whether Section 5 of the VAT Act should apply in the present case, that is, the supply of goods and services shall be deemed to take place at the time an invoice is issued by the supplier.

Ruling

On the basis of facts submitted, Section 5 of the VAT Act does not apply since in construction business invoices are only issued in the light of the progress of work as certified by the Architect/Quantity Surveyor. The invoice issued on 29 September 2006 was based on the value of works to be certified and not on the value of works already carried out and certified.

Go Top

VAT R10

Facts

A company has as object the provision of factoring services which include the following:

(a) Providing upfront finance against book debts of up to 80% of the invoice value, also known
as "recourse factoring";
(b) Sales ledger maintenance of accounts related to the "account receivables", known as "ledger
keeping";

(c) Collection of "accounts receivable" (debt management); and

(d) Credit protection against default in payment by the buyer, also known as "non-recourse
factoring".

Point in issue

Whether all the services provided by the company as stated at (a) to (d) ,and which relate directly to the provision of debt factoring, fall within the meaning of "factoring" under item (d) of the Sixth Schedule to the VAT Regulations, and therefore exempt from VAT.

Ruling

Although the term 'factoring' has no legal definition, the services provided by the company as detailed above are debt factoring services within the meaning given in Finance & Accounting literature on the subject. Those services therefore qualify as exempted services by virtue of item (d) of the Sixth Schedule to the Value Added Tax Regulations.

Go Top

VAT R11

Facts

A company incorporated in the Netherlands forms part of an international group. It was awarded a contract by the Mauritius Port Authority for the execution of certain dredging work in view of the construction of an oil jetty and the extension of the berthing facilities at the Mauritius Container Terminal in the English Channel. The dredger is equipped with four stationary engines. Two of the engines are used for propulsion. The propulsion engines enable the plant to move from one location to another, either on the same site or from one country to another. The remaining two engines are used for dredging purposes.

Point in issue

Whether it can be confirmed that the engines used for dredging purposes are stationary engines and therefore fall within the ambit of Section 21(2)(e) of the VAT Act.

Ruling

As the propulsion engines enable the plant to move from one location to another and the other engines are used for dredging purposes they are not stationary engines, and therefore do not fall within the ambit of section 21 (2) (e) of the VAT Act.

Go Top

VAT R12

Facts

A company is in the business of processing visa applications for tourists. The invoice which it will be issuing to its customers for the services rendered will be made up of two components:
(a) Service charge - for processing the application
(b) Disbursement - payable to the foreign authorities for granting the visa

Point in issue

(i) whether the services at (a) & (b) above are subject to VAT If the answer to (i) is in the affirmative,

(ii) whether turnover for VAT purposes is the value of the total invoice, or only the service charge component.

(iii) whether VAT is chargeable on the value of the total invoice, or only on the service charge component after excluding the disbursement component.

Ruling

(i) The services provided by the company constitute a "supply" in accordance with Section 4 (1) (b) of the Value Added Tax Act. As the supply is a taxable supply, it is subject to VAT.

(ii) The turnover for VAT purposes does not include the amount charged to the client and payable to the foreign authorities for granting visa.

(iii) VAT is chargeable on the amount invoiced to the client, excluding the amount charged on behalf of the foreign authorities for granting visa, provided the different components of the amount charged are shown separately on the invoice.

Go Top

VAT R13

Facts

A company operates a hotel. Certain of its guests use limousines to travel on the island. The limousines are not owned by the company but are leased from a private operator, the lessor. The latter charges a monthly rental to the company, which in turn makes a separate charge for the limousines used by the guests on the invoice it issues to them.

Point in issue

Whether the Vat charged by the lessor can be claimed by the company.

Ruling

VAT charged on the lease rentals incurred in respect of the limousines can be claimed as a credit by the company by virtue of Section 21 (2)(c) of the VAT Act as this relates to services used to make a taxable supply and not for the company's own use or consumption.

Go Top

VAT R14

Facts

Company A and Company B are two companies registered in Mauritius forming part of a group. Company A is a company registered with the BOI under the Investment Promotion Act and will be engaged in the provision of health services. Company B is engaged in construction activities and has been awarded a contract for the construction of a clinic for Company A.

Point in Issue

Whether under the VAT Act

(i) the construction of the building by Company B for Company A, otherwise the supply by Company B is zero-rated?

(ii) the additions, extensions and substantial renovations made to the clinic (by Company A ) should be construed as "construction" in accordance with the term "construction of a purpose-built building" in column 2 at item 13 of the Ninth Schedule and therefore exempt from VAT?

(iii) input tax suffered by Company B will be available as a credit against output tax in the course or furtherance of its business?

(iv) input tax incurred by Company B attributable to both taxable and exempt contracts can be apportioned on the basis of the taxable period in which the input tax has been incurred ?

(v) any excess input tax attributable to the contract with Company A will be available for refund under Section 24?

Ruling

(i) The construction of the building by Company B for Company A, otherwise the supply by Company B, is not zero rated under the VAT Act as it is not of a description that appears in the Fifth Schedule.

(ii) It is confirmed that for the purpose of item 13 of the Ninth Schedule to the VAT Act, the term construction includes additions, extensions and substantial renovations made to a clinic and consequently the recipient of the supply is exempted from payment of VAT on that supply.

(iii) It is confirmed that input tax suffered by Company B will be allowed as a credit against output tax of the company in the course or furtherance of its business, provided all conditions laid down in Section 21of the Act are satisfied.

(iv) Input tax incurred by Company B attributable to both taxable and exempt contracts can be apportioned only on the basis of the turnover of the previous accounting period in accordance with the provisions of sub-section 3 (b) of Section 21 of the Act.

(v) Company B will be entitled to repayment on any amount of excess input tax, provided the conditions laid down in sub-section 2 of Section 24 are satisfied.

Go Top

VAT R15

Facts

A private limited company registered in Mauritius, owns a 3-acre centre offering premier horse quarantine facilities including the following:

(iv) Fresh water and hay supply
(v) Fresh bedding
(vi) Tailor made feeding programme
(vii) Veterinary Services, and
(viii) Blacksmith services

The company's clients are exclusively overseas clients who are based overseas, and the horses are flown to Mauritius unaccompanied by the client. The horses transit in the local quarantine centre where they receive the above services before being flown back to other destinations after a short interval of time. The company's clients have no permanent establishment in Mauritius.

Point in Issue

Whether the services offered by the company are zero-rated supplies in accordance with Section 11 (2) and Items 6(a) in the Fifth Schedule of the Act.

Ruling

The services cannot be said to be zero-rated supplies on the grounds that the clients of the company are outside Mauritius at the time that the supplies are made or the services are performed, and that the company's clients have no permanent establishment in Mauritius.
The supply of services referred to at Item 6(a) of the Fifth Schedule means a supply of services which are not utilised in Mauritius. In this case the company has contracted with a person outside Mauritius to provide services to be utilised by the horses in Mauritius.

Go Top

VAT R16

Facts

A Limited, a property developer intends to construct villas for sale to foreigners who will then entrust the villas to a well-known hotel operator for commercial letting to holiday-makers for periods not exceeding 90 days. Each foreign owner would be entitled to use the villa for personal purposes for not more than 6 weeks each year. The hotel operator will pay to each foreign owner a rental fee based on his share of pooled income from the letting of the villas.

A Limited, as well as each foreign owner, intends to apply for VAT registration given that:

(i) A Limited will be making taxable supplies as provided under item 48(b) of the First Schedule to the VAT Act;

(ii) each foreign owner will be making taxable supplies in excess of the annual registration threshold of Rs2 Million and will therefore need to be compulsorily registered for VAT.

Points in issue

Whether it can be confirmed that

(a) the property developer can be VAT registered as it would be making taxable supplies under item 48(b) of the First Schedule to the VAT Act, given that the villas sold will not be for residential purposes;

(b) each foreign owner will need to be compulsorily registered for VAT, given that each of them would be making taxable supplies from commercial letting above the registration threshold.

Ruling

On the basis of facts provided, it is confirmed that

(i) A Ltd, the property developer, is required to be VAT registered in accordance with Section 15 (1) of the VAT Act 1998 as it will be making taxable supplies in respect of sale of villas not for residential purposes, as provided under item 48 (b) of the First Schedule to the VAT Act.

(ii) each foreign owner is required to be compulsorily registered for VAT in accordance with Section 15 (1) of the VAT Act 1998 as it will be making taxable supplies from commercial letting.

Go Top

VAT R17

Facts

An airline company does not presently claim any input VAT on its crew accommodation invoices when these are charged by hotels, nor on passenger accommodation whenever there are flight delays. Providing crew accommodation is, however, part of the normal operating activity of the company as is also that of providing accommodation to its passengers in the event of delays due to technical or other problems. 15% VAT on hotel invoices thus represent a major cost to the company which thus inflates local costs.

Point in issue

Whether 15% VAT on accommodation invoices charged by hotels in respect of crew accommodation and accommodation for passengers during delayed flights can be claimed as input tax by the company.

Ruling

Section 21 (2) (c) of the VAT Act states in clear terms that no input tax is allowable as a credit against output tax in respect of "accommodation or lodging". As the law stands, VAT charged on accommodation invoices cannot therefore be claimed as input tax.

Go Top

VAT R18

Facts

E Ltd provides outbound roaming facilities to its subscribers. Whenever a subscriber wants to avail himself of the roaming facilities he applies for such a service against a deposit fee. This enables the subscriber to use the mobile network of E Ltd's foreign roaming partners (i.e. foreign service providers-FSPs) in the foreign country. On a daily basis, E Ltd receives details of the usage of the subscriber and the corresponding amount charged by the FSP (inclusive of the foreign country's VAT, if applicable). E Ltd raises an invoice on the subscriber to claim the amount charged by the FSP. In addition E Ltd charges the subscriber a roaming charge, representing 15% of the amount charged by the FSP, for services provided to the latter in Mauritius. Depending on the settling arrangements that exist between E Ltd and the FSP the amount collected from the subscriber, excluding the roaming charges of 15 %, is paid to the FSP.

Point in issue

Whether E Ltd should charge the subscriber VAT-

(i) on the total amount invoiced to the subscriber, including the amount charged by the FSP; or

(ii) only on the roaming charges charged by E Ltd.

Ruling

(i) The outbound roaming services fall outside the scope of VAT since these are provided outside Mauritius and by the FSP.

(ii) The roaming charges of 15% of the amount invoiced by the FSP are for services provided in Mauritius by E Ltd and are therefore subject to VAT.

Go Top

VAT R19

Facts

T Ltd, headquartered in India, provides consulting and IT services to clients globally as partners to conceptualize and realize technology driven business transformation initiatives. It has a branch, registered in Mauritius since December 2002, and also registered for VAT purposes. T Ltd operations in Mauritius comprise of both IT services and Finacle® implementation.

T Ltd owns an IPR (Intellectual Property Right) of a banking software product Finacle®, which caters for the needs of the global banking industry. As with software products continuous research and development effort is required for updating/enhancing the product to increase its utility for customers, a typical Finacle® customer will have the following agreements entered into with T Ltd:

1. Licence Agreement:
Under this agreement the customer is granted the rights to use the software for his internal use. The customer pays a one-time licence fee to T Ltd for the procurement of such rights.

2. Annual Technical Support (ATS) Agreement
Under this agreement T Ltd provides technical support on Finacle® to the customer, a significant portion of which is provided by common support staff operating from T Ltd offices in Bangalore, India, and also at the customer location in Mauritius. The customer pays an annual 'ATS fee' to T Ltd .

3. Customisation and Installation Agreement
Under this agreement T Ltd provides professional services for customizing the Finacle® product to the customer's needs and implementing it in the operating environment of the customer. The latter pays a one-time 'customization and installation fees' to T Ltd.

4. Training Agreement
Under this agreement T Ltd provides training to the end users of the customer in Finacle® , mainly at the customer location in Mauritius. The customer pays a one-time 'training fee' to T Ltd.

The branch is not a separate legal entity. All the contracts with the customers are signed by T Ltd and work authorizations for T Ltd personnel to work in Mauritius are sponsored by the end customers. The branch will be providing the necessary logistical support to these personnel while in Mauritius only.

Points in issue

1. Confirmation as to whether the services described in each of the 4 agreements should be subject to VAT.

2. Whether VAT applies in each of the following cases:

(a) services provided by T Ltd to Mauritian customers;

(b) services provided by T Ltd to Mauritian customers where these services are performed from outside Mauritius;

(c) services provided by T Ltd to Mauritian customers where the services are provided partly from outside Mauritius and partly from Mauritius;

(d) services provided by T Ltd to overseas based customers while these services are performed in Mauritius.

Rulings

1. It is confirmed that the services described in each of the 4 agreements concluded by T Ltd with the customers for the use of the banking software product Finacle® are subject to Value Added Tax pursuant to the provisions of Sections 4 (1) and 9 (1) of the VAT Act 1998, as they constitute a taxable supply of services made in Mauritius by the branch which is a taxable person registered for VAT in the course or furtherance of its business.

2. (a)to(c).As T Ltd is providing services in Mauritius through the branch, a permanent establishment located in Mauritius, the services provided to Mauritian customers in each of the scenarios referred to at 2(a) to 2(c) above are subject to VAT as these are taxable supplies of services.
2(d).The services provided from Mauritius by T Ltd through its permanent establishment in Mauritius to overseas based customers are supplies which are zero-rated in accordance with item 6 (a) of the Fifth Schedule to the Act, "being supply of services made to a person who belongs to a country other than Mauritius and who is outside Mauritius at the time the services are performed in Mauritius."

Go Top

VAT R20

Facts

M Ltd is a private company incorporated in Mauritius and engaged in the marketing of petroleum goods (i.e. Mogas, Gas oil, fuel oil, Jet A1 & lubricants)in the country. The company has 13 retail outlets which are basically run on two models:

(a) Dealers-operated retail outlets, where land is owned by the dealer.

(b) Company owned Company operated (COCO) retail outlets, where a contractor is appointed by the company to manage the station.

In the first model, the retail margins on Mogas and Gas oil are fully enjoyed by the dealers as the land on which retail outlet has been developed is contributed by him. In the second model (COCO), the retail margins on Mogas and Gas oil are shared between M Ltd and the contractor on an agreed formula, in accordance with the terms of the contract.

Points in issue

Whether it can be confirmed that

(a) No Vat charge should apply on 'retail margin sharing' as the retail margin has already suffered VAT;

(b) M Ltd is correct in charging VAT on 'equipment fee' and that the depiction thereof on the invoice is correct;

(c) Arithmetical calculations of both VAT elements (in specimen invoices) as shown in Annexure E are correct.

Rulings

(a) It is confirmed that since the retail margin has already suffered VAT no charge to VAT should apply on the 'retail margin sharing' as sharing of retail margin between the lessor and the lessee does not amount to a supply of services.

(b)) It is confirmed that M Ltd is correct in charging VAT on 'equipment fee.' However, the VAT element on the invoice should be shown in such a way that it clearly indicates that it is in respect of both oil and equipment fee.

(c) As the VAT is chargeable on the value including the retail margin of liquefied petroleum gas we suggest that the invoice be amended to show : -

(i) The value inclusive of the retail margin but exclusive of VAT ;

(ii) The amount of VAT charged and the rate applied.

Go Top

VAT R21

Facts

P Ltd was issued with a letter of intent for an IRS project on 16 June 2006, that is prior to 1 October
2006. The IRS project will include the construction of 20 Standard 4 bedroom villas and amenities. A
detailed list of the building works and services which are part of the IRS project was submitted in
annexes to the application.

Point in issue

Whether the exemption under item 65 of the First schedule to the VAT Act is applicable to all costs
associated with each of the building works and services listed in annexes to the application.

Ruling

Item 65 of the First Schedule to the Act provides for the exemption of the “construction of a building
or part of a building, flat or tenement (excluding repairs and renovations) to be used for residential
purposes ....”

Construction works on the 20 Standard 4 bedroom villas and works and services directly connected
to the construction of those villas supplied to P Ltd by the main contractor and subcontractors
nominated by the main contractor in advance and the services supplied by architects, engineers and
quantity surveyors for the design and management of the works directly connected with the
construction of the villas are exempted from VAT.

However, works and services related to the provision of amenities forming part of the IRS project
such as landscaping, golf amenities, beach restaurant, boat house and swimming pool, the furnishing
of the buildings and the marketing and financial management of the project would not fall under Item
65 of the First Schedule to the Act.

Go Top

VATR 22

Facts

Société C is a 'Société Civile d'Attribution' registered in Mauritius with a share capital of Rs
4,000,000 owned in equal proportion by two associates, viz A and B.
The Société is the owner of three contiguous plots of land of a total acreage of 321.5 toises situated at St Jean Road Quatre Bornes which it has resolved to develop by the construction of a 9-storey building comprising parking lots, office and commercial spaces as well as residential accomodation.

Under the project it is proposed to increase the share capital (parts sociales) of the Société into 106 'Group de Parts Sociales' with a corresponding attribution of 106 lots. The shares will initially be issued to the two co-owners. Potential buyers will be required to subscribe to the share capital of the Société and the value attributable to the respective shares will depend upon

(i) the date on which the shares are transferred

(ii) the value of the construction work in progress as certified by the Quantity Surveyor

Subsequently, the buyer will contribute towards the construction works through a Current Account with the Société until the construction is completed. At the completion of the project the Société will be dissolved and the various lots attributed by a 'partage' to each owner.

Point in Issue

(i) Whether Société C is a property developer under item 48 of the First Schedule to the Act?

(ii) In case the Société is considered a property developer under item 48 of the First Schedule,
whether the transfer of right to the property through the transfer of shares will be a taxable supply?

(iii) In case the Société is considered a property developer under item 48 of the First Schedule is the time of supply determined to take place

(a) at the time when the shares are transferred? or

(b) at the time when the Société is dissolved and the different lots effectively attributed

Ruling

(i) Société C is a property developer under Item 48 of the First Schedule as it is the initiator of the property development project and directly involved in the carrying out of the project, whereas the other investors or potential buyers will be only joining in at different stages to become owners of their proportionate lots.

(ii) On the basis of the above ruling, in accordance with Item 48(a) of the First Schedule of the Act, the transfer of right to the property to be used for residential purposes or parking lots to be used by eventual owners of the residential property will be an exempt supply.

(iii) As Société C is a property developer and should be registered for VAT, the time of supply, in accordance with Section 5 of the Act, is the time a VAT invoice is issued or the time payment for the property is made either through purchase of shares or contribution towards the Current Account, whichever is the earlier.

Go Top

VATR 23

Facts

E Ltd is a company registered for VAT and is engaged in the preservation of the environment. It
provides services such as the collection of used oil, sludge and hydrocarbon waste from such waste-producers throughout the island as well as from ships berthed in Port Louis, owned by non-resident companies and not registered in Mauritius.

E Ltd invoices the non-resident companies operating the foreign vessels in respect of the charges for the collection of the used oil and wastes from their vessels.

Point in issue

Whether it can be confirmed that the supply of services to the non-resident companies operating the foreign vessels is a zero-rated supply.

Ruling

It is confirmed that the supply of services made to the non-resident companies operating the foreign vessels is a zero-rated supply pursuant to Section 11 of the VAT Act 1998 and in accordance with item 6(a) of the Fifth Schedule to the Act.

Go Top

VATR 24

Facts

A Developer intends to carry out a development project under the IRS scheme which will comprise of a number of luxury apartments and villas together with conference, commercial and wellness centres etc, annexed thereto.

The properties to be sold fall in three major categories:

(i) apartments and villas forming part of a rental pool which shall be managed by a hotel operator, herein referred to as “ Hotel Residences”;

(ii) villas which shall be managed by a rental management operator, herein referred to as “Non-
Hotel Residences”;

(iii) conference, commercial and wellness centres which shall be managed by specialist operators.

The properties will be marketed to both foreigners and Mauritians. The main purpose of the acquisition of these properties by the investors is to earn a yield on the investment, either by generating an income stream through commercial letting or through an appreciation in value.

The owners of the “Hotel Residences” will be obliged to participate in a rental pool programme operated by a hotel operator for the purpose of conducting a hotel business, in accordance with the terms of the rental pool agreement which will be signed at the conclusion of the sale with each owner of a Hotel Residence. The rental agreement provides for the deduction of all operating expenses, control and management expenses, as well as the payment of all taxes.

The owners of residences not forming part of the rental pool programme will be entitled, on a voluntary basis, to rent their properties, i.e. “Non-Hotel Residences” through a separate rental programme which will be managed by a rental management operator. In accordance with this agreement, the latter will be remunerated with a monthly management fee representing a percentage of the gross rental income.

The owners of both the Hotel Residences and the Non-Hotel Residences intend to let their properties for a period not exceeding 90 days, but on a renewal basis. These owners also intend to apply for VAT registration as they expect to make an annual turnover of taxable supplies of more than Rs 2 Million. The Developer as well intends to apply for VAT registration as he expects to make an annual turnover of taxable supplies of more than Rs 2 million.

Points in issue

(i) whether the owners of Hotel Residences and Non-Hotel Residences will be making taxable
supplies;

(ii) whether the owners referred to in (i) above who anticipate to have an annual turnover
exceeding Rs 2 million will need to be compulsorily registered for VAT;

(iii) whether as a result of (i) and (ii), the Developer needs to be compulsorily registered for VAT, given that he will be making taxable supplies of more than Rs 2 million.

Ruling

On the basis of the facts given, it is confirmed that :

(i) the owners of Hotel Residences and Non-Hotel Residences will be making taxable supplies;

(ii) the owners referred to in (i) who anticipate to have an annual turnover exceeding Rs 2 million will be required to be compulsorily registered for VAT in accordance with Section 15(1) of the VAT Act 1998 as they will be making taxable supplies from commercial letting;

(iii) the Developer will be required to be compulsorily registered for VAT under Section 15(1) of the VAT Act, given that he will be making taxable supplies of more than Rs 2 million in respect of the sale of villas not falling within the First Schedule.

Please note that being given the owners of Non-Hotel Residences will be entitled to “rent their properties on a voluntary basis”, no claim for repayment of tax will be entertained under Section 24 of the Act in their respect unless and until satisfactory evidence is provided that they have actually started letting their property.

VATR 25

Facts

S (Mauritius) Ltd carries on the activity of refuse disposal in Mauritius. As a pioneer of the cleaning industry, it has been constantly renovating its plant and machinery and kept pace with the changes in technology. It operates four stations around the island where all garbage and waste are disposed. The present trend is to collect garbage and waste around the island in compactors and trailer compactors and send these to the station units for final disposal.

The compactors and trailer compactors are machinery mounted on trucks or lorries, and even if these trucks are not moving, the compactors keep compacting the waste. The compactor engine can only run if the engine of the truck is continuously running, thus consuming fuel. The trailer compactors also keep compacting all the way to the stations. The concept in this project is to avoid trucks and lorries taking several trips to the disposal units, thus also avoiding polluting the island and traffic congestion. At the stations there are machineries consuming diesel which are fixed and remain on site.

Points in issue

Whether the Company can be allowed to claim a credit of 50% of the input tax paid on diesel against output tax in respect of the compactors and trailer compactors mounted on trucks and lorries?

Ruling

Section 21 (2) (e) states as follows:

"No input tax shall be allowed as a credit under this section in respect of-

petroleum oils and other oils or preparations of heading No 27.10 of Part I of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, except-

(i) fuel oils;
(ii) oils or preparation used for resale; and
(iii) gas oils for use in stationary engines, boilers and burners"

In view of the above provisions, no input tax can be allowed for diesel used in respect of compactors and trailer compactors which are machinery consuming diesel mounted on trucks and lorries, being given that these are not 'stationary engines'.

However, diesel used on machinery which are fixed and remain on site can be claimed by the Company as credit for input tax against output tax.

VATR 26

Facts

P Ltd is a company which acts as a reservation platform between customers and taxi operators/contract bus operators for the provision of taxi services in the island. Bookings for the service can be done online, using the Company's website, or via its hotline after office hours. Upon a booking, a taxi is sought to meet the expectations of the client. Clients are invoiced by the Company and the proceeds are treated as sales. The taxi operators are subsequently paid by the Company and the transaction is treated as cost of sales.

The Company provides taxi services both to companies and individuals, including VIP services, transport of employees and for general use. It does not itself hold any taxi permit but sub-contracts with individuals holding proper taxi permits. The business relations between the Company and taxi operators are backed by service agreements which include tariffs, and also provide for full responsibility to be taken by the taxi operators/contract bus operators for any loss or damage occasioned to any person in case of an accident.

Points in issue

1. Whether the income derived by P Ltd is subject to VAT?

2. In the event the answer to 1 above is in the affirmative, whether the clients of the Company can claim the relevant input VAT as a deduction?

Ruling

1. P Ltd does not hold licences for transport of passengers by public service vehicles. It outsources the transportation service to contractors who hold appropriate public service vehicle licences, viz. taxi operators and contract bus operators. In essence, the Company derives its income for acting as a reservation platform between customers and contractors. Such service provided by the Company is a taxable supply and therefore subject to VAT in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 (1) of the VAT Act.

2. The provisions of item 27 of the First Schedule to the VAT Act are as follows:

" The transport of passengers by public service vehicles excluding contract buses for the transport of tourists and contract cars."

Since public service vehicles include taxis, no VAT will be charged by taxi operators as the supply is an exempt supply. The Company will therefore charge VAT only on the fee receivable for acting as a reservation platform. On the other hand, operators of contract buses for the transport of tourists and operators of contract cars will charge VAT on their supplies to the Company. For administrative convenience therefore, P Ltd may charge VAT on the full amount of such supply, which will also allow the VAT registered operators to claim input VAT as a deduction in respect of their taxable supplies to the Company, in accordance with Section 21 (1) of the Act.

Go Top