Chapter 2 - Evaluation of Data 

2.1       Introduction 

Evaluation or appraisal means the measurement of achievement against goals. Evaluation techniques are often necessary to determine whether the data collection was properly done and that the data are of acceptable quality.

A census, being a massive data collection exercise involving thousands of field interviewers, errors may creep in at any stage of data collection and processing. An evaluation of the census data is desirable to assess the quality the data. Evaluative studies probe into the qualitative and the quantitative aspect of the data. Errors being probed fall into two broad headings - coverage and content errors. According to the United Nations, good census practice requires a careful consideration, and an evaluation of the completeness and accuracy of census results. 

The three main objectives of the evaluation are:

(i)      To identify the types and sources of errors or biases in order to know which groups, items or methodology produce the errors.

(ii)      To measure the accuracy of the data.

(iii)      To adjust the data by taking into account the varieties and amount of errors present. 

Broadly, two methods are available for census evaluation, the direct and the indirect method. The direct method involves the comparison of information collected in a census with data from other sources such as post-enumeration sample surveys or re-enumeration. This method has not been used for the 2000 census evaluation. Instead, the indirect method consisting of external and internal consistency checks has been used. 

Chapter 2

2.2       Coverage error 

2.2.1    Introduction 

Coverage error is a non-sampling error that may occur in various forms, namely:

·        Omitting a unit that should have been included.

·        Including a unit more than once

·        Including a unit that should not have been included. 

In spite of the fact that massive efforts were made in providing good training and up-to-date cartographic maps to the field staff as well as introducing checks and controls throughout the fieldwork, such errors may still occur.  

Chapter 2

2.2.2    Balancing equation by sex 

The balancing equation is one of the methods used for detecting coverage errors. 

Table 2.1 compares the 2000 enumerated population of the Republic of Mauritius, with the expected population based on the previous census, vital statistics and international migration data. 

Table 2.1-Balancing equation by sex, 2000 Census - Republic of Mauritius 

The table indicates a net deficit of 4,925 persons (-0.42%), that is a deficit of 6,896 males (-1.18%) and an excess of 1,971 among females (0.33%). Similar calculations for the 1990 census showed a net deficit of 474 (-0.04%) with an excess of 719 for males (0.14%) and a deficit of 1,193 (-0.23%) for females. Though the coverage errors seem to be more pronounced in the 2000 census, they are acceptable when compared to international norms. 

Chapter 2 |List of Tables

2.2.3    Growth rate 

An analysis of inter-censal growth rates can also help in the evaluation of the census data. Table 2.2 gives the average annual growth rate for the last four inter-censal periods. 

Table 2.2-Population annual growth rates (%), 1962-2000 - Republic of Mauritius

 

 List of Tables

The natural growth rate shows a smooth decline over time depicting essentially a fall in fertility registered over the years. However, the same smooth decline is not observed with net growth rate. This is due to the fact that during the period 1983-1990 significant increase in out-migration, especially among females was registered and hence a relatively low growth rate.

The net growth rate when compared by sex, generally indicates higher values for females; this is essentially due to lower mortality among females. However, despite this, the situation was different in 1983-90 mainly due to more out-migration of females. 

Chapter 2

2.2.4    Age composition 

The distribution of the population by sex and broad age groups for the last four censuses is shown in Table 2.3. 

Table 2.3 - Age composition (%) of the population by sex: 1972, 1983, 1990 and 2000 Censuses - Republic of Mauritius

 

List of Tables 

The change in the age distribution from one census to another can be summarised as follows: 

·        A decrease in the proportion of children aged 0-4 and 5-14 over time

·        An increase in the proportion aged 15-44 up to 1990 followed by a slight fall in 2000

·        A general decline in the proportion of males aged 45-59 followed by a sudden increase in 2000 while among females, a general increase is observed

·        A general increase in the proportion aged 60 years and above 

The decline in the proportion aged 0-4 and 5-14 is mainly due to a general fall in fertility registered over the years.  The jump in the proportion of the population aged 15-44 from about 43% in 1972 to 50% in 1983 is due to births of the high fertility period 1957-1968 entering that age group. Average number of births during that period was around 26,000 annually. Birth cohorts leaving that age group came from relatively low fertility years (1927-1938). Similarly increases registered in 1990 are due to birth cohorts 1968-75 entering that age group, during which 21,500 births were registered annually. The slight fall registered in 2000 could be due to the fact that the disparity in the size of birth cohorts entering and leaving that age group was only slight.

The large increase in the proportion aged 45-59 in 2000 is mainly due to the entrance of post-war baby boomers (born during period 1945-55) into that age group. The tendency towards increasing proportion aged 60+ with time is an indication of an ageing population. The higher proportion of females among the elderly is the consequence of lower mortality among females. 

Table 2.4 - Mean and median age of the population - Republic of Mauritius

 

The general rise in the mean and median age of the population is also indicative of the process of ageing under way in the population. Both the mean and the median have increased by around 3 years during the intercensal period 1990-2000. It is also noted that the mean and median age are higher for females than for males. This is again due to differential mortality between males and females whereby females live longer than males. 

Chapter 2 |List of Tables

2.2.5    Sex ratio 

The sex ratio is defined as the number of males per 100 females. The table below shows a general fall in sex ratio except for the period 1983-1990 when a slight increase was registered.  

Table 2.5 - Sex ratio of the population - Republic of Mauritius 

The trend in sex ratio over the years is influenced by the degree of sex differentials in the three factors affecting the change in population size and structure, namely fertility, mortality and migration. The sex ratio at birth which is usually above 100, indicating more males being born than females, tends to increase the overall sex ratio of the population. Net migration can either increase or decrease the overall sex ratio while a differential in mortality in favour of females depresses the overall sex ratio. The mortality factor usually being the most influential, tends to depress overall sex ratio over time. The different situation noted during the period 1983-1990 was mainly due to higher out-migration of females compared to males.  

Chapter 2 |List of Tables

2.2.6    Child-woman ratio 

The child-woman ratio is defined as the number of children aged 0-4 years per 1,000 women in the age group 15-44 years. It is a crude measure of the level of fertility derived from census data. Table 2.6 shows a general decline in the child-woman ratio from 473.7 in 1983 to 363.3 in 1990 and 316.7 in 2000 for the Republic. It declined both in the Island of Mauritius and the Island of Rodrigues over the same period, though the decline in the latter island was sharper. It should however be noted that in spite of the sharper fall in fertility in Rodrigues, the level of the child-woman ratio is still higher than in the Island of Mauritius. 

The above observations are in line with the fertility decline registered over the past two decades. In fact, the TFR (defined as the average number of children born to an average woman assuming that she survives to the end of her child-bearing age and is subject to a fixed schedule of age-specific fertility rate) in the Island of Mauritius fell from 2.29 in 1990 to 1.99 in 2000, that is by about 13.1%, while in the Island of Rodrigues it fell from 3.19 in 1990 to 2.70 in 2000, that is by about 15.4%.  

Table 2.6 - Child-woman ratio at the 1983, 1990 and 2000 Censuses - Republic of Mauritius 

Chapter 2 |List of Tables

2.2.7    Dependency ratio 

The dependency ratio represents the ratio of the combined child population (0-14 years) and the aged population (65+ years) to the population of intermediate age (15-64 years). It is a rough measure of economic burden the productive population has to bear. It can be split into child dependency and old age dependency.

 The table below shows the dependency ratios calculated for the last three censuses. The figures indicate a general decline in the total dependency ratio from 588 in 1983 to 539 in 1990 and 460 in 2000. This fall is mainly attributable to a fall in child dependency brought about by a fertility decline. It has also been observed that there has been a continuous increase in the old-age dependency ratio. This is the result of both fertility decline and mortality improvement. 

Table 2.7 - Dependency ratio by sex: 1983, 1990 and 2000 Censuses - Republic of Mauritius 

 

 Another salient feature visible in the data is the higher old age dependency among females than among males again due to the fact that women live longer than men.  

Chapter 2 |List of Tables

2.3       External consistency checks 

2.3.1    Comparison of Population Census with Housing Census count 

The Housing Census was conducted from February to April 2000 while the Population Census was taken at the beginning of July 2000. At the Housing Census, 297,881 private households and 1,168,495 persons were enumerated compared to 296,832 private households and 1,165,570 persons at the Population Census. Thus a minor differences of around 0.3% in the population figures and 0.4% in the household figures are observed.

Given that the Housing Census enumeration covered a period of 3 months (February-April 2000), it may happen that some households who own secondary residences have been counted at both their principal and secondary residences at the Housing Census. However this was not the case with the Population Census, which was taken on a specific census date (night of 2-3 July 2000). 

Chapter 2

2.3.2    Comparison of Population Census with education statistics 

Education statistics is yet another external source of data with which Census data can be compared. Figures from the 2000 survey conducted in March by the Ministry of Education are compared with census data on students currently going to school in table 2.8 below. 

Table 2.8 - Comparison of 2000 Census data on school population by age group and sex with statistics from the school system - Republic of Mauritius 

According to the table, deficits of 6.2% among males and 6.0% among females in the age group 5-9 years are noted in the census figures, indicating that there may be some under-enumeration. In the age group 15-19 years, an over-enumeration of about 11% is noted in the census data for both males and females. It should be pointed out that school statistics as regards enrolment in vocational or post-secondary schools are not complete. On the whole however, there is an over- reporting of school attendance at the census of the order of 0.9% and 0.6% among male and females respectively.  The discrepancy being relatively small, it can be concluded that there is compatibility between the two sources of data.  

Chapter 2 |List of Tables

2.3.3    Comparison of Census data with population estimates. 

The expected population for year 2000 was made by surviving the adjusted 1990 Census figures by age and sex using:

(i)      Live births data by sex

(ii)      Deaths by age and sex

(iii)     International migration data by age and sex 

Since data for international migration are not available for Rodrigues, comparison will be restricted to the Island of Mauritius only. 

Tables 2.9 (a) and 2.9(b) compare the enumerated resident population with the expected population. The tables show that discrepancies occur mostly in the age bracket 0-9 years and 20-39 years among both males and females. Discrepancies occurring at age 0-9 years are attributable to under-enumeration of young children. 

Differences occurring in the age bracket 20-39 years are negative among males and positive among females. This is mainly attributable to the poor quality of passenger traffic data as regards sex ratio of migrants. The sex ratio used in calculating intercensal population estimates was in favour of females, that is there were more females migrating, while census results indicate the contrary.  This also leads to population estimates with a higher sex ratio than census figures. Some degree of age mis-reporting may also have contributed to the discrepancies observed. 

Despite these discrepancies, the enumerated census 2000 population shows consistency with the expected 2000 population.

Table 2.9(a) - Comparison of 2000 enumerated population with expected population based on 1990 Census data by age and sex, Island of Mauritius - Male

 

Age (years) Enumerated Expected Difference
0 9,163 9,718 -555
1 9,103 9,547 -444
2 9,095 9,613 -518
3 9,032 9,626 -594
4 9,467 9,731 -264
(0-4) 45,860 48,235 -2,375
5 9,789 10,264 -475
6 9,810 10,340 -530
7 10,555 10,778 -223
8 10,632 11,169 -537
9 10,443 10,759 -316
(5-9) 51,229 53,310 -2,081
10 10,397 10,263 134
11 9,968 9,974 -6
12 9,411 9,538 -127
13 8,909 9,010 -101
14 8,753 8,988 -235
(10-14) 47,438 47,773 -335
15 9,076 9,142 -66
16 9,329 9,360 -31
17 9,616 9,659 -43
18 10,479 10,526 -47
19 10,947 11,206 -259
(15-19) 49,447 49,893 -446
20 11,852 11,900 -48
21 10,914 11,154 -240
22 10,837 11,051 -214
23 10,331 10,502 -171
24 9,391 9,764 -373
(20-24) 53,325 54,371 -1,046
25 9,904 10,288 -384
26 9,456 9,873 -417
27 8,547 8,730 -183
28 8,692 8,983 -291
29 8,791 9,085 -294
(25-29) 45,390 46,959 -1,569
30 9,728 9,967 -239
31 8,852 9,110 -258
32 9,911 10,189 -278
33 9,643 9,994 -351
34 10,605 10,945 -340
(30-34) 48,739 50,205 -1,466
35 10,304 10,667 -363
36 10,517 10,658 -141
37 10,311 10,414 -103
38 9,994 10,035 -41
39 9,377 9,482 -105
(35-39) 50,503 51,256 -753
40 9,463 9,708 -245
41 8,817 8,820 -3
42 8,770 8,716 54
43 9,078 9,013 65
44 8,611 8,606 5
(40-44) 44,739 44,863 -124
45 7,660 7,759 -99
46 7,539 7,448 91
47 7,960 7,813 147
48 7,221 7,233 -12
49 7,960 7,833 127
(45-49) 38,340 38,086 254
50 6,838 6,848 -10
51 5,783 5,654 129
52 5,474 5,483 -9
53 5,000 4,936 64
54 4,073 4,052 21
(50-54) 27,168 26,973 195
55 4,582 4,663 -81
56 4,351 4,238 113
57 3,249 3,201 48
58 3,313 3,299 14
59 3,128 3,071 57
(55-59) 18,623 18,472 151
60 3,314 3,377 -63
61 2,870 2,714 156
62 2,970 2,900 70
63 2,975 2,866 109
64 2,679 2,614 65
(60-64) 14,808 14,471 337
65 2,694 2,571 123
66 2,733 2,597 136
67 2,314 2,257 57
68 1,869 1,862 7
69 1,794 1,799 -5
(65-69) 11,404 11,086 318
70 2,005 1,950 55
71 1,917 1,845 72
72 1,847 1,810 37
73 1,709 1,761 -52
74 1,789 1,792 -3
(70-74) 9,267 9,158 109
75 1,539 1,504 35
76 1,425 1,367 58
77 1,104 1,053 51
78 1,017 1,012 5
79 820 756 64
(75-79) 5,905 5,692 213
80 647 596 51
81 563 530 33
82 457 433 24
83 451 442 9
84 388 382 6
(80-84) 2,506 2,383 123
85+ 1,324 1,122 202
N/stated 41 0 41
All Ages 566,056 574,308 -8,252

Chapter 2 | List of Tables

Table 2.9(b) - Comparison of 2000 enumerated population with expected population based on 1990 Census data by age and sex, Island of Mauritius - Female

Age (years) Enumerated Expected Difference
0 8,965 9,289 -324
1 8,738 9,093 -355
2 8,860 9,286 -426
3 9,007 9,551 -544
4 9,305 9,557 -252
(0-4) 44,875 46,776 -1,901
5 9,603 10,148 -545
6 9,877 10,186 -309
7 10,436 10,714 -278
8 10,222 10,553 -331
9 10,133 10,338 -205
(5-9) 50,271 51,939 -1,668
10 10,093 9,929 164
11 9,646 9,759 -113
12 9,221 9,238 -17
13 8,849 8,654 195
14 8,601 8,548 53
(10-14) 46,410 46,128 282
15 8,730 8,697 33
16 9,032 8,989 43
17 9,404 9,454 -50
18 10,296 10,293 3
19 10,664 10,837 -173
(15-19) 48,126 48,270 -144
20 11,642 11,645 -3
21 11,248 11,094 154
22 11,117 10,780 337
23 10,280 10,102 178
24 9,706 9,687 19
(20-24) 53,993 53,308 685
25 9,949 9,905 44
26 9,625 9,587 38
27 8,391 8,150 241
28 8,900 8,773 127
29 8,791 8,412 379
(25-29) 45,656 44,827 829
30 9,565 9,192 373
31 8,875 8,506 369
32 10,014 9,701 313
33 9,399 9,247 152
34 10,454 10,285 169
(30-34) 48,307 46,931 1,376
35 10,157 10,260 -103
36 10,305 10,151 154
37 9,800 9,785 15
38 9,905 9,840 65
39 8,984 8,818 166
(35-39) 49,151 48,854 297
40 9,194 9,455 -261
41 8,761 8,681 80
42 8,712 8,564 148
43 8,581 8,553 28
44 8,320 8,205 115
(40-44) 43,568 43,458 110
45 7,690 7,810 -120
46 7,516 7,391 125
47 7,897 7,911 -14
48 7,146 7,124 22
49 7,820 7,628 192
(45-49) 38,069 37,864 205
50 7,005 7,020 -15
51 5,994 5,937 57
52 5,933 5,889 44
53 5,125 4,989 136
54 4,499 4,569 -70
(50-54) 28,556 28,404 152
55 5,186 5,325 -139
56 4,681 4,601 80
57 3,684 3,664 20
58 3,690 3,701 -11
59 3,406 3,346 60
(55-59) 20,647 20,637 10
60 3,824 3,865 -41
61 3,308 3,171 137
62 3,406 3,497 -91
63 3,458 3,287 171
64 3,252 3,272 -20
(60-64) 17,248 17,092 156
65 3,277 3,152 125
66 2,930 2,945 -15
67 2,749 2,703 46
68 2,274 2,264 10
69 2,372 2,369 3
(65-69) 13,602 13,433 169
70 2,540 2,620 -80
71 2,338 2,344 -6
72 2,400 2,447 -47
73 2,301 2,432 -131
74 2,375 2,431 -56
(70-74) 11,954 12,274 -320
75 2,254 2,257 -3
76 2,003 1,886 117
77 1,529 1,585 -56
78 1,518 1,450 68
79 1,377 1,303 74
(75-79) 8,681 8,481 200
80 1,117 1,115 2
81 882 848 34
82 886 910 -24
83 871 794 77
84 660 621 39
(80-84) 4,416 4,288 128
85+ 3,410 2,953 457
N/stated 73 0 73
All Ages 577,013 575,917 1,096

Table of Content | Chapter 2 |List of Tables